Wednesday, November 29, 2006

The Bird Must Die!

Have you ever noticed the pessimism some birders express when it comes to the survivability of vagrant or late birds, especially during late fall or winter? There's even almost a prideful sense of knowledge embraced being the bearer of bad news that the bird will probably die. There's a cold front coming in tonight and the Wisconsin Bird Network is abuzz concerning a hummingbird in Kenosha. Invariably, along comes the sentiment that if the bird doesn't leave soon, it will most likely succumb to the cold and perish.

Well...perhaps, but not so fast.



What's wrong with being optimistic about its chances? I am. Of course I know the hardships of migration will eliminate millions of birds each spring and fall, but I think many such vagrants, especially hummingbirds, are heartier and more resilient than we've understood in the past and presently give them credit for. Why is it assumed that the vagrant bird we're watching is the one that's going to die?

I'll not deny that vagrancy can be costly. If studies on mortality rates and vagrancy exist, I would be very interested in learning about them. However, I do know there are records of late vagrant hummingbirds banded in the northeast, recaptured only days later further to the south after a major cold front had moved through. Amazingly, in other cases banded birds were recaptured in subsequent years having endured the "vagrant path" more than once.

What are these birds truly capable of? Take the Ruby-throated Hummingbird and its migration potential. It can cross the Gulf of Mexico in a non-stop 24-hour flight. That's around 600 miles! When survival is at stake, how much distance can other hummingbird species put between them and a storm front? Give them a little credit!

Hummingbirds can also thermoregulate their body temperature to drop almost 50 degrees and go into torpor - a type of nocturnal hibernation or noctivation. Their heartbeat can decrease from 500 beats per minute down to 50, lowering its metabolic rate by as much as 95%. Even its breathing may briefly stop.

Some have said torpid hummingbirds exhibit a slumber that is nearly as deep as death. In 1832, Alexander Wilson first described hummingbird torpor in his book, American Ornithology; "No motion of the lungs could be perceived ... the eyes were shut, and, when touched by the finger, [the bird] gave no signs of life or motion."

Nevertheless, they awake. It takes a hummingbird nearly 20 minutes to come out of torpor and a bird in such a lethargic state is very susceptible to being taken by predators. But that's the give and take of such a survival strategy - good for enduring cold snaps, but potentially dangerous in other ways. That it is an adaptation is a powerful indicator that it works far more often than it fails.

Anyway, I observe this gloomy "bird must die" sentiment over and over again. The lingering Cave Swallows that came through the Midwest last winter all died. The Ash-throated Flycatcher that was seen up until a severe cold snap died. Some birders confessed to me that they thought the Yellow-rumped Warbler in my backyard last year would die the night the temperature dipped to 15 below. Well, it didn't. But they killed it off when another birder told me that a Cooper's Hawk must have eaten it after the warbler hadn't been see for a few days.



Just because such a bird is no longer being seen doesn't necessarily mean it died. Of course it doesn't prove it survived either. Where's the corpse? But if vagrancy means certain death, as some birders on listservs invariably portray it, then why does it exist? I mean, can't a bird just fly away every once in a while?

All images © 2006 Michael McDowell

8 Comments:

At 3:48 AM, Anonymous Nuthatch said...

National Wildlife just came out with an article on wintering hummingbirds in the east (http://tinyurl.com/v3fz5). Banders are learning that some of these birds have returned to their "wrong" wintering areas in subsequent years. And Rufous Hummingbirds are very cold tolerant...geez, they nest in areas up to 1800 meters at high latitudes. For many bird species, food availability is more limiting than temperature. If it has a heated feeder and some shelter in a thick patch of conifers for instance, it could hang in there most of the winter.

 
At 11:06 AM, Blogger Birdfreak said...

Excellent points. Why not be optimistic. So many "old" birders always lament on how few birds there are and how all birds are doomed. What about the Whooping Crane, Peregrine Falcon, Brown Pelican, herons and egrets, etc. etc. They were pretty much screwed in the past and are doing considerably better now.

A hummingbird with a fresh feeder supply might be better off in the winter than other times because of less competition and less predation (such as bullfrogs, spiders, praying mantis).

Birds are so adaptable to weather, I would like to think a lot make it through poor weather. And when a bird "disappears" why presume death? I had a Red-headed Woodpecker in my city backyard in N. IL that vanished for a few days only to rematerialize at a later date, with a mate.

 
At 3:47 PM, Anonymous Ryan Brady said...

I agree entirely, Mike, with one exception -- as Nuthatch alluded to, there's increasingly more evidence that these Rufous Hummingbirds in WI and other more eastern locales are NOT vagrants. That bird may have passed unnoticed through WI at this time of year for a number of years now, en route to a typical wintering area in the Gulf states.

 
At 4:54 PM, Blogger Mike McDowell said...

I'm with you, Ryan.

From my post:

'Amazingly, in other cases banded birds were recaptured in subsequent years having endured the "vagrant path" more than once.'

I tried to imply that they're not actually lost, but I was probably too subtle with that comment.

Or perhaps I used the term "vagrant" in a broader scope to get my point across. Wisconsin is certainly nicely nested between breeding and wintering ranges via migration route for Rufous Hummingbird, but we're still not included in either area on traditional range maps. I essentially meant an "out of range" bird in the sense that common thinking suggests the bird ought to be somewhere else, preferably further south. For hummingbirds such as the Rufous, I personally don't consider them lost in the same context we might think of a wintering Ash-throated Flycatcher in Wisconsin. The point of my post was to be critical of the almost invariable pessimistic sentiment that every southern "out of range" bird that comes along and lingers in Wisconsin is probably going to die.

Mike

 
At 7:47 AM, Blogger Erika said...

Thanks for this post, Mike. I am the person in Kenosha County currently hosting this bird and while the buzz has certainly been noticeable on the list, I've had quite a few personal messages in my email about the certain demise of this bird. This morning I had a conversation with someone who told me that by feeding the bird the nectar I've been providing all along, I'm simply giving it "a candy bar."

I'm a novice birder, just doing my best to assist this remarkable bird in whatever way I can. I know how nature works and I know that it's not always such a gloomy scenario. Instead of weighing on the "what ifs" I plan on enjoying this hummer for as long as she continues her regular visits to my feeder.

 
At 8:17 AM, Blogger Matt M said...

I'm with you all the way Mike. There have been various Osprey sightings in Suffolk, England this last week. Obviously it's very late, but there's no real reason why it shouldn't over-winter here. Lakes are unlikely to freeze for any great length of time, and rivers very rarely do

 
At 6:51 AM, Anonymous sitta said...

I would guess that migratory vagrants have probably always formed a vanguard for a species' allopatric range expansion.

A great example is the blackcap story from Europe: basically, blackcaps migrate from Europe to Africa, but natural variation in migratory direction results in a small proportion flying in a non-African direction. These "vagrants" didn't contribute much to the gene pool because they never returned from wintering in the far north *until* the advent of birdfeeding in the UK (post-1940s), which enabled many of these vagrants to survive and return to breed. Both of these strategies persist due to the presence of ample resources on their respective wintering grounds; however, recent evidence has shown that the UK wintering birds return to the breeding grounds sooner and lay an average of one egg more.

So-another way to think of vagrants is a way for a genome to put out "feelers" into the environment, hedging its bets against a changing environment and hopiong to exploit unknown resources.

 
At 5:24 PM, Blogger Hope Batcheller said...

Thank you for this post...it makes an excellent point. Too often, I think, people worry about the fate of these vagrants. I may be hard-hearted, but isn't this the normal process of natural selection? If vagrancy is helpful or even non-harmful, the bird will survive; if it's not helpful, the bird won't.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home