Monday, December 11, 2006

A closer look at Binoculars – advice from a birder.



I don't think Consumer Reports could have been more out of optical alignment when it comes to recommending binoculars for birdwatching. Whether you're a birder, hunter, or general nature enthusiast looking for a pair of binoculars, here is where I think Consumer Reports' "A Close Look at Binoculars" (Jan 2007) ought to be filed:



While they're entitled to their opinion, those of us who are intimately familiar with binoculars and use them for birding were quite bewildered by their top picks. I've used most of the binoculars on their list and some of them are fine compact binoculars – but that's precisely the problem. When birding is the pursuit, I generally expect to see a lineup of 8x42 bins topping the list and perhaps a few 10x42 bins for those specialized birder needs; hawk watching and shorebirds. Naturally, there will be exceptions. A person I regularly bird with swears by her 10x42 for warbler watching.

The reason most birders go with an 8x42 is because they represent the best combination of magnification, aperture and physical size to deliver a bright image at a moderate power with a decent field of view that can be held steady. It's that simple! Oddly enough, there wasn't a single 8x42 out of 16 binoculars from a total of 36 they looked at. To illustrate the trouble with compact binoculars, take a look at the following Exit Pupil diagrams (exit pupil is the diameter of the shaft of light exiting the eyepiece of a binocular):



Exit Pupil is calculated from aperture divided by magnification (42 / 8) = 5.25mm. In bright light your pupil may narrow down to 2mm and some of the 5.25mm shaft of light will hit your iris (above left). But at dawn or dusk when your pupil is dilated to 5mm or more, an 8x42 will deliver about as much light as your pupil will take (above right).



Consider that Consumer Reports recommend a 10x21 with an exit pupil slightly over 2mm – such a binocular is worthless in early morning under a wooded canopy. You'll hate it!

Consumer Reports graded the binoculars on best sharpness, brightness, focus, grip and durability. They subjected them to temperature extremes over several hours and even "swung them against a hard surface." Perhaps that explains why so few full-size binoculars made their list – the bigger they are, the harder they fall. I wonder if they saved that particular test for last?

Addendum:

Here are my personal favorite binoculars across various price ranges. These are the same ones I would recommend to birders over the phone.

Under $100

1. Bushnell Natureview 8x42 Porro
2. Leupold Yosemite 6x30

Quick points: Both binoculars offer excellent optical quality for the price. The Yosemite is a great choice for young birders. While the Natureview isn't waterproof, the Yosemite is. Neither binocular is fog proof, though.

Under $200

1. Vortex Sidewinder 8x42
2. Bushnell Excursion 8x42

Quick points: Both have a super wide field of view. Great close-focus on the Sidewinder.

Under $300

1. Eagle Optics Ranger SRT 8x42
2. Nikon Monarch ATB 8x42
3. Audubon Equinox HP 8x42

Quick points: The Ranger and Monarch are the lightest weight full-size roof prism binoculars around. Both binoculars have received glowing reviews over the years. The Audubon HP is a terrific runner-up (I own a set).

Under $500

1. Vortex Viper 8x42
2. Celestron Regal LX 8x42

Quick points: The Viper is super bright in low-light...I would like one!

Under $800

1. Vortex Razor 8x42
2. Minox HG 8.5x43
3. Nikon Premier SE 8x32

Quick points: The Razor has excellent resolution at distance. The Nikon SE is simply one of the all-time best views through a binocular you'll get (I own one).

Under $1000

1. Zeiss Conquest 8x40
2. Vortex Stokes DLS 8x42

Quick points: The Conquest has good sharpness, but color fringes quite a bit. The DLS is very bright and extremely durable. My DLS is two years old, has held true alignment even after being dropped and has been rained on many times without a problem.

Under $1500

1. Leica Trinovid 8x42
2. Nikon Premier LXL 8x42

Quick points: Super-premium optical quality for those unwilling to spend at the next level.

Under $2000

1. Swarovski EL 8.5x42
2. Swarovski EL 8x32
3. Zeiss FL 8x42

Quick points: Naturally, the 8.5 for best low-light performance, but have you ever looked through the EL 8x32? Phenomenal binocular. The Zeiss FL has the best color correction I've seen, but it's a little soft on the edge.

10 Comments:

At 2:06 PM, Blogger JOAN PENROD said...

I really enjoy your site.

you are a talented photographer.

could you compile a list of binoculars, for say: entry level. mid level and high end? I have been looking for some binos for a friend, but I cannot afford a 1000 dollar pair.

thank you.

 
At 6:24 PM, Anonymous Mon@rch said...

Found this blog a very interesting approach to binoculars and one which I have never thought about before! BTW: Love that old binoc shot!

 
At 5:11 AM, Anonymous Steve said...

I thought this looked good.
http://www.birdersworld.com/brd/default.aspx?c=a&id=591

 
At 6:12 AM, Blogger Mike McDowell said...

Hey Steve,

That list is a little out-dated, and there are a few discontinued models on it. I'll try to come up with a list and publish it here.

Mike

 
At 12:32 PM, Anonymous Bob Ellis said...

I am a little shocked that Consumer Reports seems to have not done the research to find out what configurations work well for birding. Their naming a 10x21 as a best bet for use "in the field" as they say is about as far from the mark as one could get.

Mike, have you made an attempt to contact CR and enlighten them?

 
At 4:23 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

And that's always been the problem with Consumer Reports. They may do an "objective" review of a particular type of "niche" product, but they don't always review the product for the qualities that the niche product's consumers are interested in. I've been nailed several times in purchasing a brand/model that's highly recommended by CR for a particular product, only to find that what CR examined it for wasn't at all what really mattered in choosing that product. In the end, I had to trade, sell, or just shelve what I initially bought. I usually had to replace the CR item with whatever the "buzz" indicated was the best brand/model out there. I quit subscribing to CR years ago.

 
At 10:23 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I recently saw a new binocular from the Burris manufacturer. The Euro Diamond. I saw one web site which offers it for $699. That binocular looks pretty much like an Swarovski EL. But at about half the price of one I am certainly temped to buy one. But I know that I certainly don't need one. I have 12 pairs now, though none of them are very expensive, the most expensive one about $360, another, $250.

 
At 11:32 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mike,

What are your thoughts on image-stabilized binocs? I've owned a Canon 10x30 for a while (got them as a gift) and what they do to a scene is nice.

But I'll admit - I've held some 8x42's that weren't imaged-stabilized that had a much cleaner picture.

William Stamper

 
At 11:47 AM, Blogger Mike McDowell said...

A 10x30 renders a 3mm exit pupil, so it's not especially good in low-light compared to an 8x42. Plus, increased aperture delivers greater resolution (glass and coating quality being equal). Plus, the 10x30 Canons have a very limited warranty and are not waterproof/nitrogen purged. IS bins work, but there can be compromises to consider.

MIke

 
At 12:41 PM, Blogger junie said...

Thanks for the reviews. I am looking for glasses for my partner... I have the Nikon Premier SE 8X32 and frankly can;t imagine trading them for anything, in any price range. I can spot birds faster, better and in worse light than folks with Swarovskis and Zeiss...

 

Post a Comment

<< Home