More about Baiting Wild Owls

The following comment was received...
"People should be educated, not criticized. Feeding the owl is not the dangerous thing on its own feeding it near the road is very dangerous. Boreal owls are very friendly by nature, just like the great gray owls. They have a tendency to get closer to humans since they are not afraid of people. If it was a bad thing for them to be fed mice from people, this would be illegal. Since it is not illegal, one can assume that it is not what's dangerous on its own. People say they can find their own food. oh sure, but the simple fact that they are there just show that they had to move because they could NOT find their food and had to move south. If they can find their own food so well..when why do they come rushing to catch the mice that people offer them? They like to hide their food and store them for harsh time. It's in their nature and there must be a good reason for that. Maybe their survival rely on plenty of food source stored and if that's the case, having more mice is a blessing. People just have to learn to do it the right way and keep the owl away from the dangerous road. Here in Quebec when people feed the snowy and yes we do have northern hawk owls too, we do it far from the roads. Here too it is not illegal to feed the birds, just like it is not illegal to give seeds to birds."
The argument I see most often employed in justifying the baiting of owls with live rodents for photography is to point out that feeding backyard birds is ethical, therefore the practice of baiting for all birds, regardless of species, habitat or type of bait, must also be ethically permissible. A related argument used is that baiting them isn't illegal, so it must be okay - otherwise it would be against the law, right?
Part of the problem with the former argument is it assumes that boreal owls can be treated in the same manner as birds like Northern Cardinals or House Finches - species that have habituated around people for over a hundred years and have most likely benefited (numbers-wise) from backyard bird feeding. If they really are the same (boreal owls and certain songbirds), then what we can say about one, we should be able to say about the other with nothing left over, so I encourage you to stand out in the middle of a field with a feeder full of safflower to lure in those owls. Just make sure there are no rules, laws or ordinances using birdseed in an ecologically sensitive natural area that might disrupt native flora.
Going along with providing backyard birds food to eat is the responsibility of offering them fresh seed in clean feeders. Since there are many diseases birds can die from by eating moldy birdseed or taking food from feeders that aren't routinely cleaned, a question of ethics can also be regarded and respected. The same can be true of using rodents acquired from a pet store and subsequently fed to owls. In one sad case I'm aware of, a rehabilitation center unwittingly provided a bad batch of live rodents to their clinic birds and an education Bald Eagle. The rodents were diseased and several rehab birds perished, including the eagle. This particular center now removes the intestines from prey food to prevent diseases like salmonella. Can you personally guarantee that rodents offered to a bird of prey, just to lure it in for a photograph, are free of diseases that may harm or kill it?
While on the subject of treating things as equals, how about the ethics of releasing a pet store rodent into the wild? Is it ethically permissible to release an exotic gerbil or hamster into the wild, just because they're rodents or perhaps a ferret or chinchilla just because they've come from a pet store? Depending on laws in your area, it may actually be illegal (without proper credentials) to release or relocate any mammal, wild or exotic. When releasing live rodent bait, there's a possibility the critter will escape its intended "photo-op" purpose and subsequently have to deal with an environment it's genetically unsuited for, and again, create the potential of introducing harmful diseases or parasites to native fauna.
The risk isn't worth the reward.
Rather than spend time and energy defending the practice of baiting wild owls with live rodents, I recommend rising to a greater challenge in nature photography – see if you can do it without the extra help...hone your field craft and study the birds. By becoming an expert on bird behavior, you'll discover you won't need to bait owls in order to get a nice picture. Sure, I occasionally take photographs of birds in my backyard, but it never matches the sense of accomplishment I feel when coming off the field with a great shot of an unbaited, wild bird.
Great Gray Owl image © 2007 Mike McDowell










9 Comments:
Thanks Mike for bringing this subject to my attention. I never dreamed that people who love birds so much would be so careless. Baiting owls in my opion is just not a good practice. Thanks again.
Sincerely, Teresa Sacia
Good response to that comment Mike. People don't always think through all the implications of their decisions. Oh, and a nice picture as well.
-nemesisbirder
Mike:
Nice points! The weirdest baiting technigue involved a local photographer here in Duluth that used fresh sausage, then managed to stick fur on it and then tied the sausage mouse to a fishing line/fishing pole to lure Great Gray Owls towards him for that flight shot. In fact, that flight shot photo of the Great Gray Owl used on the Hawk Ridge Owl Symposium advertising was taken using that procedure.
Mike H.
"If it was a bad thing ... this would be illegal."
My word! If the laws of various governments were the only constraint on human behavior, this world would be in an even sorrier state than it already is.
Governments do not exist to make all of our decisions for us.
i would not encourage any baiting just for the sake of photography. if a photographer really need good pictures, he/she should have the patience to wait for the right moment to snap. it has to be wild and natural. i have heard bad story about a photographer who glued newly hatched kingfisher on a branch while waiting for the parents to come to feed the chick. a day after the shooting, the chick died. is this wildlife / nature photography or cruelty?
For what it's worth, I share your concern regarding conditioning a wild owl to expect hand-outs from people along busy roadways.
If you look at the admission stats - http://www.theowlfoundation.ca/2005Admissions.htm - of the Owl Foundation, you'll see that human interference and vehicle collisions account for over half of the owl admissions to the rehab centre. Anything we do that reduces a wild owl's fear of humans can't be good, can it?
Great blog and photos - thanks.
When I was at the North American Ornithological Conference in Veracruz this fall, there were several sessions about the high incidence of owl mortality along highways. ANYTHING that keeps them close to a road is potentially lethal to them. And salmonella is always an issue with pet shop mice.
Photographers often try to justify unethical techniques by claiming that their beautiful photos are used for education and have conservation implications. But because there are so very many people taking photos of birds nowadays, that argument no longer holds water. And compare Mike's shots to those of birds being gawked at by dozens of people. I KNOW owls, after rehabbing scores of them. I know when a bird is at rest compared to one that has its eyes partially closed to avoid detection by birds but is closely watching the photographer's every move. With Mike's pictures, it's as if you're alone with the bird, living its natural life, not one that has been thrust into the role of a rock star.
owls make birders/photographers do stupid things.. you already know how I feel about this issue and I've been banned from more than one 'birding' forum for speaking out against baiting owls. I no longer post ANY owl sightings to any listservs.. period.
There is so very little honor in baiting an irruptive species that I would honestly be embarassed to even admit I had done such a thing. The snowy owl photos I have taken myself were a total fluke. The owl jumped up out of a ditch and I never left the truck while observing/photographing it.. I wished it good hunting, then we backed up turned around and left, so we wouldn't spook it from it's hunting place. I spent maybe 5-10 minutes observing it.. that was plenty of time to get many photos and just celebrate the fact that it was *there*.
Oh and BTW, the owl that I spoke out against that was being baited frequently, a beautiful hawk owl, was found dead on the road within a week- a victim of a car hit. Such a complete senseless waste of life- all for photos. I can't comprehend that mindset nor do I want to.
Your photos show what can be done with a little patience.. and ALOT of respect.
"Since it is not illegal, one can assume that it is not what's dangerous on its own".
Buying a semi-autmotic rifle is not illegal but it is still dangerous! Just because it isn't illegal it doesn't mean photographer's (and I am one) should bait owls that may result in injury or death for the bird. I personally think it should be illegal just like using of tapes and CD's of bird songs are on most nature preserves. I've seen some photogrpaher's employ this method to get the desired shot regardless of the effects of the breeding species.
I guess at the end of the day there are photographer's who respect nature and photographer's who don't. The latter are usually in love with their wallets and personal ego!
<< Home