Sunday, February 10, 2008

Northern Shrike Shift


Northern Shrike

So, is anything going on with Northern Shrikes in Wisconsin in 2008 or not? Well, one person thought there was nothing unusual about this year, while another offered that perhaps the entire shrike population shifted south for reasons unknown. Personally speaking, in all the years I've been birding in the Madison area, I've never observed so many shrikes. They're at Governor Nelson, Pheasant Branch, Nine Springs, Middleton Business Park. Even a co-worker of mine had one die from a window collision at her home. I can't recall ever reading about them showing up in backyards and eating suet until this year. Hmm. How about some data?

The most convenient and readily accessible place for me to check for species specific observational data is eBird. I ran a few national reports and nothing looked too out of the ordinary, but when I selected only the state of Wisconsin from January 1st, 2008 to the present, I noticed an interesting frequency increase beginning around late January:


(click graph for larger image)

Perhaps the most interesting thing about this graph is how 2005 and 2008 are practically reverse in this specified date range. Both 2006 and 2007 are very similar years with a gradual frequency decreases, and by January 15th, the year 2005 blends very nicely with those two years. But not 2008. Beginning in late January and early February there is an upward frequency shift.

eBird notes: "Frequency is the percentage of checklists reporting the species within a specified date range and region. This is the most conservative way of displaying the eBird data."

What's the correct interpretation of this data? Darned if I know. As one particular Minnesota birder is so fond of pointing out, I'm certainly no expert. Ryan Brady's southern shift of the entire population for an explanation is appealing, but if so, why did this happen? One wonders if having twice the normal snowfall this winter somehow factors into what appears to be a frequency shift running into early February 2008 when compared with recent years.

Addendum:

Taking a look at 2007 fall migration eBird graph for all states, the Northern Shrike showed a pretty substantial increase in frequency against previous years on record:


(click graph for larger image)

Considering this graph, it seems reasonable to conclude shrikes were on the move before the record snowfalls and definitely supports 2007/2008 as an irruptive season.

From Birds of North America:

"Hypothetically, dependence on sparse and difficult-to-catch prey (small birds and mammals) in wintertime and winter mortality are main factors controlling number of shrikes from year to year, rather than any conditions on breeding grounds. Just how natality, mortality, and dispersal relate to cyclic or irruptive winter occurrence of shrikes remains to be determined (Cade 1967, Davis and Morrison 1988, Cade and Swem 1995)."

Northern Shrike © 2008 Mike McDowell

3 Comments:

At 1:48 PM, Blogger Lana Gramlich said...

Wow...how intriguing!

 
At 8:49 PM, Blogger lisa marie said...

I haven't seen one of these guys but they look pretty. I live in PLover but travel all over Wisconsin. I'll keep my eyes out. :)

 
At 3:35 PM, Blogger Seth said...

This Fall and Winter season I started to see a few people on the Wisconsin Birdnet post seeing Northern Shrikes early. So I decided to count any shrikes that I see for this "winter" season. This count that I am working on will run from Oct. 29th (date first shrike seen) to March 31.

I have my count on excel and can send it to anyone who would like to see it. So if you would like to know what kind of season it has been for shrikes well here are some the basic facts of my count. First of all I have seen shrikes in 18 counties. Most have been on CBC's that Noel (my dad) and I have done. We did 11 so that puts us out in some good shrike areas.

For the count I do a total of all new/ first time seen shrikes that I see. Then I also list each total by month. Mike says that E-bird says that numbers have gone up in Jan. This is not what I have noted just birding. At least in the SE area that I normally bird. Part of this could be from almost no CBC's in Jan. but since the New Year it does not seem like they are around as much as before.

More facts from my count. Total By Month: Oct 3 (but then started on the 29th), Nov. 4, Dec. 28 (mostly seen on CBC's) Jan. 19

Also if I am in an area and see a shrike one day, then see it again in the same area I will not count it two times. Example is we have for a few months had one down the road from us. It was seen a number of times so was only counted one time.

Some Day high counts: (12/26/07= 5) (12/29/07= 7) (1/4/08= 5) and then highest (1/15/08= 8)

The total as of today (2/12) is at 54......So I say WOW!

I remember a number of years when doing CBC's that it might be a few counts before seeing even one shrike. This year I think I had a shrike on all but 1 or 2 of the 11 CBC

The idea about more snow for more shrikes I am not sure holds up...Take a look at the numbers of Northern Harriers, Rough-legged Hawks, and American Kestrels vs Shrikes...Reasons to look at these species? Well they all tend to hunt in open fields, and all tend to eat about the same kind of food. Small mammals such as mice...But numbers of both Harriers and Rough-legged Hawks have been down, at least I have not seen many...

So deep snow might not have much to do with more shrikes being around...that is if they all hunt the same food? It seems like the Rough-legged Hawks and Harriers have moved South more so then in past years.

If one looks at Kestrels vs Shrikes then why more shrikes then kestrels? They should hunt and eat the same things, since they can both take small mice like things but also take small birds...Kestrel numbers seem to be normal around here vs shrike numbers seem to be larger? Why? On one hand Kestrels live around here all year long and can move South if needed. With Shrikes they live to the North of us most of the year and only get into this part of the state when needed? So does anyone to the South of us see even more Kestrels then normal? If not then why not have tons of Kestrels and tons of Shrikes at the same time?

So to get back to Mike's first question. Is it a good year for Shrikes? I say yes, take a look at my count numbers and then ask why? Also look at the other species that eat some of the same things they do...why not more of those? Anyway good birding to all and have fun thinking more about shrikes.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home